English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article makes a comparative analysis of the institutional designs that regulate the participation of victims in Colombia before and after law 1448 of 2012, in order to identify factors that limit the influence these citizens aim to achieve in the participative scenarios created by the State. I conclude that while this law has introduced rules to make the participation of victims a more inclusive and democratic process, certain elements of the overall policy structure remain that keep it separated from the programmatic and budgetary decision-making aspects, with enormous gaps in coordination between the complex and disperse institutional frameworks responsible for assisting and providing reparations to the victims, and which generate new problems of collective action. This, added to the state’s inability to ensure the safety of the victims and their local leaders, greatly hinders the capacity of the Law to affect decision-making and creates enormous challenges that should be taken into account by the Colombian State in order to redesign policy and ensure effective participation.

Análisis comparativo de los diseños institucionales que regulan la participación de las víctimas en Colombia: antes y después de la Ley 1448 de 2012