English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Este escrito comienza por analizar la funcion tan clave como paradojica que cumple el afuera en Deleuze: ser a la vez lo que no puede ser pensado (lo no-representable) y lo que tiene que ser pensado (la consistencia misma de lo no-representable en cuanto da que pensar), para luego senalar las inflexiones que se producen, via Foucault, desde su conceptualizacion blanchotiana hasta su recepcion deleuziana. This dissertation starts by analysing the function, as fundamental as it is paradoxical, that plays the outside in Deleuze: being at the same time that which cannot be thought (the non-representable) and that which has to be thought (the consistency itself of the non-representable as it induces reflexion). It then points out the inflexions produced, via Foucault, from its Blanchotian conceptualization to its Deleuzian reception.

Del «afuera del pensamiento» al «pensamiento del afuera»: Deleuze entre Blanchot y Foucault