English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

RESUMEN El articulo propone un estudio comparado de dos concursos cuyo relato y desenlace revelan su caracter premonitorio en la evolucion de la arquitectura de la segunda mitad del siglo XX. Surgidos ambos por iniciativa publica, traslucen dos ambiciones urbanas, programaticas y politicas distintas. La formulacion de estas dos promesas arquitectonicas por sus autores en concursos anonimos, sufre a lo largo de sus procesos de realizacion numerosos ajustes y transformaciones que mas alla de su condicion coyuntural ofrecen argumentos de reflexion sobre la importancia del procedimiento en la conformacion de la arquitectura. El transito arquitectonico al que se ven sometidos, permite interrogarse sobre la propia condicion y estructura del proyecto arquitectonico que adquiere una nueva dimension. La trascendencia de ambas obras en el debate disciplinar y social del momento consolida el concurso como camino para la realizacion de la obra publica. Sus silencios y contradicciones nos hablan sin embargo de la resolucion de un dilema imposible y califican la propia condicion del arquitecto. SUMMARY This article proposes a comparative study of two competitions whose story and outcome reveal their premonitory character in the evolution of architecture in the second half of the twentieth century. Both arose through public initiatives and reveal two different urban, programmatic and political ambitions. The formulation of these architectural promises by their authors in anonymous competitions suffered numerous adjustments and transformations throughout their realization processes which, beyond their temporary condition, offer arguments of reflection on the importance of the process in shaping the architecture. The architectural transition to which they were subjected allows examination of the status and structure of the architectural project itself, which acquires a new dimension. The importance of both works in the disciplinary and social debate of the time consolidates the competition as a way to carry out public works. However, their silences and contradictions speak of the resolution of an impossible dilemma and describe the architect’s own condition.

PROMESA Y CONSTRUCCIÓN. LA ÓPERA DE SYDNEY Y EL CENTRO POMPIDOU