English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The corrosion resistance was studied electrochemically for an iron-based brazing filler metal F300 and a Ni-based brazing filler metal Ni613. Both austenitic stainless steel SUS316 and ferritic stainless steel SUS444 were used as base metals for these brazing filling metals. F300 showed a higher corrosion rate than those of Ni613 and both base metals and was less corrosion-resistive. While Ni613 showed a stronger depression effect of an anodic reaction than those of base metals, F300 showed little depression effect of the reaction. As an Fe-Ni phase dissolved preferentially in F300 and a finite laminated corrosive morphology was observed, the corrosion progression along a depth direction was suggested. These corrosion behaviors depend on the difference of chemical composition of these brazing filler metals.

Corrosion behaviors of the iron-based and Ni-based brazing filler metals brazed on the stainless steels in a solution of 3.5MASS% NaCl