English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Nancy Cartwright’s arguments in favour of the phenomenological laws and against the fundamental ones are discussed. I support and strengthen her criticism of the standard coveringlaw account but I am sceptical in respect to her radical conclusions that the laws of physics lie. Arguments in favour of the opposite standpoint are based on V. Stjopin’s analysis of scientific-theory structure. A theory-change model presented here demonstrates how the fundamental laws of physics can be confronted with experience. Its case studies include the Lorentz—Einstein—Bohr transition and modern General Relativity and Quantum Field Theory unification.

How the Laws of Physics can be confronted with Experience