English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Poeta Imitatore or Poeta Facitore ? Late Renaissance Italian Discussions about Mimesis The article presents the opposition to the imitative dimension of mimesis, one of the characteristic trends in Italian late Renaissance thought in literary theory. Examples of polemics against the traditional doctrine of mimesis (F. Patrizi i G. G. Cinzio), comments on Plato’s concept of fantastic mimesis (G. Mazzoni, G. Comanini) and the terminological decisions of XVI c. theorists, willing to use the terms fingere and fare instead of the traditional imitare , show that in literary theoretical reflection at the time of the Renaissance appeared a clear appreciation of the fictionally creative aspect of poetic work. The creative dimension of the poets’ craft, utilizing creativity and imagination, is preferred and valued incomparably higher than the copy–cat method of “creating images” at the end of the XVI c.

Poeta imitatore czy poeta facitore? Późnorenesansowe włoskie dyskusje o mimesis