English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The paper is a comparative law study of the assumption of risk (volenti) defence in the field of torts (common law) and extra-contractual liability (civil law-Quebec) in Canada. More specifically, it aims at presenting and analyzing the similarities and differences regarding the conditions of application and effects of the assumption of risk defence in the areas of negligence at common law and extra-contractual liability based on fault in Quebec. The article also explains the raison d’etre of the existing differences between the two volenti defences and explores whether convergence of applicable laws exists.

The Assumption of Risk Defence in Torts (Common Law) and Extra-contractual Liability (Québec Civil Law) in Canada