English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

As we started writing this study, the current Hungarian Government announced its intention to establish a Committee of National Memory to deal, above all, with the communist epoch. This offi cially endorsed new committee will ambition to reorient the ongoing disputes over the crimes of communism and their perpetrators, and hopes to settle the most controversial questions in a conclusive manner. Without being explicit about this, Hungary thereby follows in the footsteps of other post-communist countries where institutes with nearly identical names and relatively similar agendas, such as the Polish Institute of National Remembrance (Instytut Pamięci Narodowej) or the Slovak Institute of National Memory (Ústav Pamäti Národa), have already been in operation for a number of years. The Hungarian governmental decision was announced on 19 March 2012, but the Committee is still about to get established and details concerning it have not been made public yet – unless something unexpected occurs, both will have happened by the time our paper appears in print though.1

Between Transnational Embeddedness and Relative Isolation: The Moderate Rise of Memory Studies in Hungary