z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comprehensive evaluation of canonical versus Dicer-substrate siRNA in vitro and in vivo
Author(s) -
Donald J. Foster,
Scott Barros,
Rick Duncan,
Sarfraz Shaikh,
William Cantley,
Amy Dell,
Е. Ю. Булгакова,
Jonathan O′Shea,
Nate Taneja,
Satya Kuchimanchi,
Christopher B. Sherrill,
Akin Akinc,
Gregory Hinkle,
Amy C. Seila White,
Bo Pang,
Klaus Charissé,
Rachel Meyers,
Muthiah Manoharan,
Sayda M. Elbashir
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
rna
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.037
H-Index - 171
eISSN - 1469-9001
pISSN - 1355-8382
DOI - 10.1261/rna.031120.111
Subject(s) - biology , dicer , in vivo , in vitro , microbiology and biotechnology , computational biology , rna interference , small interfering rna , non canonical , genetics , rna , gene
Since the discovery of RNA interference (RNAi), researchers have identified a variety of small interfering RNA (siRNA) structures that demonstrate the ability to silence gene expression through the classical RISC-mediated mechanism. One such structure, termed “Dicer-substrate siRNA” (dsiRNA), was proposed to have enhanced potency via RISC-mediated gene silencing, although a comprehensive comparison of canonical siRNAs and dsiRNAs remains to be described. The present study evaluates the in vitro and in vivo activities of siRNAs and dsiRNAs targeting Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog ( PTEN ) and Factor VII ( FVII ). More than 250 compounds representing both siRNA and dsiRNA structures were evaluated for silencing efficacy. Lead compounds were assessed for duration of silencing and other key parameters such as cytokine induction. We identified highly active compounds from both canonical siRNAs and 25/27 dsiRNAs. Lead compounds were comparable in potency both in vitro and in vivo as well as duration of silencing in vivo. Duplexes from both structural classes tolerated 2′-OMe chemical modifications well with respect to target silencing, although some modified dsiRNAs demonstrated reduced activity. On the other hand, dsiRNAs were more immunostimulatory as compared with the shorter siRNAs, both in vitro and in vivo. Because the dsiRNA structure does not confer any appreciable benefits in vitro or in vivo while demonstrating specific liabilities, further studies are required to support their applications in RNAi therapeutics.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom