English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

To evaluate the quality of referrals to a neovascular age-related macular degeneration clinic from optometrists using the standard Rapid Access Referral Form (RARF) from the Royal College of Ophthalmologists.A prospective study. Prospective data were gathered from all optometry referrals using the RARF, between the periods of December 2006 to August 2009. These were assessed for accuracy of history, clinical signs and final diagnosis as compared to a macula expert.Highlands NHS Trust.All patients referred to the eye department at NHS Highlands Trust using the RARF.The symptoms of neovascular age-related macular degeneration correctly identified by optometrists, and the signs of neovascular age-related macular degeneration correctly identified by optometrists.Fifty-four RARFs were received during this period, there was an overall agreement with symptomatology in 57.4% of cases. Optometrists scored less well in recognizing the clinical signs of neovascular age-related macular degeneration, with the poorest scores for recognizing macular oedema (44.4%) and drusen (51.9%). Twenty (37%) patients referred had neovascular age-related macular degeneration.RARFs make up the minority of referrals to the neovascular age-related macular degeneration clinic. Optometrists find it difficult to accurately elicit the signs of macula disease.

Quality of optometry referrals to neovascular age-related macular degeneration clinic: a prospective study