English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Ninety-eight cases of ventricular tachycardia (VT) were studied using clinical electrophysiological (EP)-pharmacological assessment to compare the efficacy of class IA (disopyramide-DP, procainamide-PA) and class IB (mexiletine-Mex, Lidocaine-Lid, aprindine-AP) agents available in Japan, and to evaluate the clinical significance of class subdivisions for the treatment of VT. In assessing the efficacy of drugs, we evaluated their ability to prevent and terminate induced sustained VT as well as their ability to suppress spontaneous premature ventricular beats (VPB). I. EP properties: DP significantly extended QTc, ERPRV, and the coupling interval by which VT or repetitive ventricular response (RVR) was induced. On the other hand, Mex and AP had no effect. Although no significant extension of QRS width was found, the significant extension of the interval from extrastimulus to the first induced VT or RVR complex by the three drugs indicates that all have suppressive effects on conduction velocity within the reentry circuit. II.

Clinical significance of vanghan williams classification for treatment of ventricular tachycardia. Study of class IA and IB antiarrhythmic agents.