English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

There has been increased interest in the beneficial effects of atrio-ventricular (AV) pacing over ventricular (V) pacing. This study attempted to evaluate the changes in cardiac output and left ventricular filling dynamics when the pacing mode was switched from V pacing to AV pacing. Study population consisted of 26 patients with multiprogrammable AV pacemakers. Cardiac output was determined as a product of echocardiographically determined cross sectional area of the aortic annulus and Doppler-determined velocity integral of left ventricular outflow over systole. Left ventricular peak rapid filling rate (PFR) and peak atrial filling velocity to peak rapid filling velocity ratio (A/R) were determined from measurements at the mitral annulus. Cardiac output showed a significant improvement when the pacing mode was switched from V to AV pacing, and the percent change ranged from 3 to 73% (average 26%). The improvement in cardiac output brought about by AV synchrony was greater in patients with smaller PFR (r = -0.71, p less than 0.01) and larger A/R ratio (r = 0.77, p less than 0.01). On the other hand, PFR was greater with V pacing than with AV pacing. Greater increment of the PFR was produced by the loss of atrial contraction in patients with smaller PFR (r = -0.82, p less than 0.01) and larger A/R ratio (r = 0.76, p less than 0.01). Thus, AV pacing provides a great improvement in left ventricular filling, i.e., cardiac output, which cannot be obtained with V pacing even with the compensatory enhancement of left ventricular rapid filling. These beneficial effects of AV pacing seemed to be greater in patients with impaired left ventricular rapid filling.

Beneficial effects of atrioventricular sequential pacing on cardiac output and left ventricular filling assessed with pulsed doppler echocardiography.