English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Several studies have reported a relationship between clinical outcomes and the ankle-brachial index (ABI) in different populations. However, the relationship in Japanese patients or in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been examined well.Methods and Results:The subjects were 1,857 patients who underwent PCI from July 2007 to May 2010 and in whom the carotid and renal arteries and abdominal aorta were examined simultaneously by ultrasonography and ABI. We investigated the relationship between ABI and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and stroke). The median follow-up was 1,322 days (interquartile range: 1,092-1,566 days). Patients with low (&lt;0.9), borderline (0.9-1.0) and high ABI (&gt;1.4) had significantly higher incidence of MACE at 4 years (31%, 15%, 10%, and 29% for the low, borderline, normal, and high groups, respectively; log-rank P&lt;0.0001) and all-cause mortality at 4 years (22%, 12%, 6.9%, and 29%, respectively; P&lt;0.0001) compared with the normal ABI group (1.0≤ABI≤1.4). The adjusted hazard ratios for MACE were 2.35 (1.72-3.20), 1.27 (0.89-1.80) and 1.87 (0.81-3.79) for low, borderline and high ABI, respectively.

Clinical Impact of the Ankle-Brachial Index in Patients Undergoing Successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention