English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The aim of the study was to compare two methods classically used in rats to determine the fractional catabolic rate (FCR) of labeled high or low density lipoproteins: constant infusion and single pulse. The FC of [14C]-sucrose HDL (High density lipoprotein) was studied. For the short term experiment (8 hours), both methods gave similar FCR determined 8 hours after HDL constant infusion (9.4%.h-1 +/- 0.6) or single pulse (8.5%.h-1 +/- 0.4), values significantly higher than those measured 24 hr after the single pulse (6.2%.h-1 +/- 0.3). The identification and simulation of the model representing HDL movements between an intravascular and extravascular pool, after single pulse and constant infusion methods, demonstrated that FCR of lipoproteins cannot be precisely measured with techniques involving excessively short observation periods.

Overestimation of the lipoprotein fractional catabolic rate(FCR) measured in short duration experiments.