English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Americans Who Have Damaged White Interests1. Lyndon Johnson2. Franklin Roosevelt3. William Clinton4. Abraham Lincoln5. Theodore [Edward] Kennedy6. Earl Warren7. Martin Luther King8. John Kennedy9. Jesse Jackson10. Richard Nixon11. James Carter12. Franz Boas13. D wight Eisenhower14. Eleanor Roosevelt15. Harry Truman16. Woodrow WilsonAmericans Who Have Advanced White Interests1. Jared Taylor2. Patrick Buchanan3. David Duke4. Thomas Jefferson5. Samuel Francis6. Robert E. Lee7. George Washington8. Wilmont Robertson9. Nathan B. Forest10. Arthur Jensen11. William Pierce12. Teddy Roosevelt13. Charles Lindbergh14. Charles Murray15. George L. Rockwell16. William ShockleyAmerican Renaissance Magazine(August 1997, p. 9)THESE RANK-ORDERED LISTS of Americans who have advanced or damaged white interests appeared in American Renaissance, a magazine that bills itself as the leading journal of race-realist thinking (Taylor 1997:9). Reasonably well argued, and free of the glaring racial epithets and jarring anti-Semitism that pepper much of the white pride literature, American Renaissance is a favorite among the tweed-jacket and sherry set of the white pride movement. The magazine's editor, Jared Taylor, published this list along with others in an article that reported the findings of an extensive survey he conducted about the views, beliefs, and interests of his readership.After presidents, recent presidential candidates, Supreme Court justices, first ladies, and Civil War heroes are crossed off, the list becomes interesting as it relates to the history of anthropology. On the side that documents those who have damaged white interests, there are two names left - Franz Boas and Martin Luther King Jr. The people left on the other side include an interesting mix of scientists, pundits, and organizers of white supremacist organizations; and, of course, one of the most celebrated heroes of the white pride movement, the American aviator turned Nazi sympathizer, Charles Lindbergh. The survey was wideranging. Taylor dutifully enumerated the number of children, handguns, and years of education of each of his readers. At first glance this survey seems to be of little significance, save for the sentiments of the 391 loyal respondents who deemed the magazine's editor the most important "American who has advanced white interests" (Taylor 1997:9).One must ask, however, why was Franz Boas even considered alongside such historic figures as Martin Luther King Jr., Earl Warren, and Lyndon B. Johnson - people easily identifiable with the civil rights movement? In short, within the quite diverse communities that advocate such things as white pride, Holocaust denial, white supremacy, immigration restriction, and a cornucopia of racisms, Franz Boas is singled out as the one scholar that white supremacists and anti-Semites love to hate.Deemed the "Godfather of the Multi-Cult Nightmare," and the fabricator of the "equalitarian dogma," Franz Boas is often portrayed within these circles as the man who somehow singlehandedly perpetuated the myth that all races have an equal potential for achieving intelligence and developing civilizations, as well as the idea that cultures cannot be evaluated against the standard of Western civilization. During the late 1940s through the mid-1960s, scholars, politicians, and pundits who were fearful of desegregation and threatened by the specter of racial amalgamation, more or less, invented or reinvented a Franz Boas who was the evil Jew who attracted a cult following responsible for spreading vicious propaganda about racial equality and cultural relativism. As one pundit opined, the idea that there are no pure races was a "hoax contrived by Franz Boas, a twisted little Jew, who popped into the United States, [and] was, for undisclosed reasons, made Professor of Anthropology in Columbia University, and founded a school of fiction-writing called 'social anthropology'" (Oliver 2003:24-25). …

The Cult of Franz Boas and His “Conspiracy” to Destroy the White Race