Writing the History of Development Economics
Author(s) -
Michele Alacevich,
Mauro Boianovsky
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
history of political economy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.872
H-Index - 30
eISSN - 1527-1919
pISSN - 0018-2702
DOI - 10.1215/00182702-7033812
Subject(s) - nexus (standard) , discipline , applied economics , positive economics , period (music) , development studies , human development theory , field (mathematics) , economics , neoclassical economics , sociology , social science , political science , mainstream economics , economic growth , philosophy , pure mathematics , embedded system , mathematics , aesthetics , computer science
This question, apparently unproblematic, has been at the center of the development discourse for decades now. Indeed, the first major debate that shaped the discipline—the 1950s balanced-growth versus unbalanced-growth debate—was fought under the rubric of what actually defined development economics as a distinct disciplinary field. Albert Hirschman (1958, 51) famously criticized the theory of balanced growth, whose principal authors he identified in Paul Rosenstein-Rodan, Ragnar Nurkse, and Tibor Scitovsky, on the ground that the theory failed “as a theory of development.” As Hirschman put it,
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom