English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Weaver et al. and Tagliati mistakenly infer clinical equivalence between globus pallidus interna vs subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation based on failure to demonstrate statistically significant differences. A clinically meaningful-not statistically significant-difference in outcome should be decided a priori, after which the sample size necessary to have a reasonable probability of detecting the difference could be determined. (4) Fortunately, the study by Weaver et al. had sufficient sample size to demonstrate a 1-point difference in motor outcomes. However, such comparisons presume optimal management so as not to produce a "ceiling effect" that would obscure differences.

neurology

Randomized trial of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease: Thirty-six-month outcomes; Turning tables: Should GPi become the preferred DBS target for parkinson disease?