English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Interferon-tau (IFN tau) is produced exclusively by the trophectoderm during the peri-implantation stage of pregnancy in ruminant ungulate species. Human choriocarcinoma cells (Jar) stably transfected with 1.8 kilobases of promoter from a bovine IFN tau gene ahead of a human GH (hGH) reporter gene constitutively synthesize hGH, but expression is not increased further by exposure to Newcastle disease virus. This and earlier experiments suggest that the transcriptional cues regulating IFN tau expression are distinct from those operating on other type I IFN genes. Transient transfection experiments reveal that two distinct promoter regions are required for full constitutive expression: one proximal (to position -126), which directs basal expression, and a more distal promoter region (positions -280 to -400), which acts as an enhancer. Nuclear extracts prepared from ovine conceptuses during the period of IFN tau expression interact with the proximal promoter region (positions -34 to -126) to form several complexes of high electrophoretic mobility. Although nucleotide sequence motifs potentially capable of binding the transcription factor IRF-1 are present in this region, IRF-1 does not transactivate the IFN tau gene. The distal part of the promoter contains only one region (-322 to -358) that forms a complex with these conceptus nuclear extracts. Both proximal and distal gel shift patterns become dramatically different when IFN tau gene expression ceases, perhaps reflecting the appearance of transcriptional repressors. Together these experiments support the conclusion that the control of IFN tau gene expression is very different from that of other type I IFN genes and that trophoblast-specific expression depends upon distal as well as proximal promoter regulatory elements.

Multiple regulatory elements are required to direct trophoblast interferon gene expression in choriocarcinoma cells and trophectoderm.