English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background: Improved patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly becoming a key treatment objective in acromegaly. Validated PROs were used to assess disease and treatment burden in the MPOWERED phase 3 trial in acromegaly, which also assessed safety and efficacy of oral octreotide capsules (OOC; MYCAPSSA®) compared to injectable SRLs (iSRLs). Methods: Eligible patients had acromegaly diagnosis, biochemical control of acromegaly (insulin-like growth factor I &amp;lt;1.3 × upper limit of normal; mean integrated growth hormone, &amp;lt;2.5 ng/mL) and ≥6 months’ iSRL treatment (octreotide or lanreotide). Eligible patients entered a 26-week Run-in phase to determine the effective OOC dose; responders at week 24 then entered a 36-week randomized controlled treatment (RCT) phase receiving OOC or iSRLs in a 3:2 ratio. The Acromegaly Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (Acro-TSQ) is a recently validated tool that includes 27 items in 6 domain scores for PROs in acromegaly.1 Acro-TSQ data were collected at baseline (reflecting outcomes on iSRLs), end of Run-in (reflecting outcomes on OOC), and end of RCT (OOC or iSRLs). Results: Of 146 enrolled patients, 92 entered RCT (OOC, N=55; iSRLs, N=37). Acro-TSQ scores at the end of Run-in (26 weeks’ OOC treatment) were compared to baseline (iSRLs). In the 92 patients randomized, 3 of 5 Acro-TSQ domains (emotional reaction, treatment convenience, and treatment satisfaction) showed significant improvement at end of Run-in compared to baseline. Injection site interference was not assessed as no injection site reactions were observed with OOC. Other domains showed a nonstatistically significant pattern of improvement at end of Run-in when compared to baseline. Patients randomized to iSRLs in the RCT after receiving OOC in the Run-in (N=37) reported more anxiety (RCT end, 53%; Run-in end, 29%) and frustration (RCT end, 45%; Run-in end, 34%) with iSRLs compared to OOC. Overall treatment satisfaction was higher while receiving OOC (Run-in end, 92%; after receiving iSRLs in RCT, 75%). Breakthrough symptoms were reported more frequently with iSRLs (31%) than OOC (15%) at the end of RCT. Conclusion: Higher patient satisfaction, convenience and emotional well-being, and improved symptom control based on the newly validated Acro-TSQ PRO reporting tool were observed with OOC compared to iSRLs in patients enrolled in the MPOWERED trial. 1Fleseriu M, et al. Pituitary. 2020 Aug;23(4):347-358.

Improved Acromegaly Patient Satisfaction With Oral Octreotide Capsules Compared With Injectable Somatostatin Receptor Ligands in the MPOWERED Trial