English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The population attending the Medical Assessment Unit at our hospital comprises patients attending electively for investigation and acutely unwell patients presenting for unscheduled care. The standard panel of blood tests taken on arrival includes thyroid function tests (TFTs, i.e. TSH and free-T4), despite a recent review questioning the clinical utility of this practice [1]. We performed a retrospective audit to determine what proportion of our patients had abnormal thyroid function on presentation, and whether these abnormal test results were being followed up. Using the iSoft Clinical Manager software, a list was generated of all patients who attended the hospital between January 2018 and June 2018 inclusive. For each attendance, we recorded the date, medical record number, patient age, gender, and TFT result. Abnormal TFT results were classified as overt or subclinical hyper- or hypothyroid, or non-thyroid illness syndrome (NTIS), based on their admission TSH and free-T4. We then examined the hospital and primary care records of patients with abnormal TFTs to determine if they had ongoing thyroid follow up post discharge. In total, 2,298 patients attended over the 6-month study period. The mean patient age was 67.2 years, and 49% were female. Thyroid function tests were ordered on the day of attendance for 1,688 patients (73%). Of these, 181 results (11%) were abnormal: 20 overt hyperthyroid (11%), 72 subclinical hyperthyroid (40%), 12 overt hypothyroid (7%), 35 subclinical hypothyroid (19%), and 42 NTIS (23%). Twenty of these patients died within 3 months of the abnormal TFT result (4 overt hyperthyroid, 3 subclinical hyperthyroid, 3 overt hypothyroid, 6 subclinical hypothyroid, and 4 NTIS). Of the remaining 161 patients, 74 (46%) had not been followed up within 3 months (4 overt hyperthyroid, 34 subclinical hyperthyroid, 3 overt hypothyroid, 15 subclinical hypothyroid, and 18 NTIS). The low percentage of abnormal TFTs (11%) in this audit is in keeping with similar studies where thyroid function testing was performed on unselected hospital populations [1]. Subclinical hyperthyroidism was by far the most common abnormality found. A high percentage of abnormal tests (46%) were not followed up, with poor compliance with thyroid management guidelines [2]. Future work will investigate adoption of an ‘opt-in’ order system [3] and electronic alerts to flag abnormal results for follow-up. [1] Premawardhana LD. Thyroid testing in acutely ill patients may be an expensive distraction. Biochemia medica. 2017; 27(2): 300-307. [2] Ross DS et al. 2016 American Thyroid Association Guidelines for diagnosis and management of hyperthyroidism and other causes of thyrotoxicosis. Thyroid. 2016 Oct; 26(10):1343-1421. [3] Leis B et al. Altering standard admission order sets to promote clinical laboratory stewardship: a cohort quality improvement study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019; 28(10): 846-52.

SUN-425 Indiscriminate Thyroid Function Testing on Acute Hospital Admissions Reveals a High Abnormality Rate Requiring Follow Up