English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background/Aims: Gender incongruent (GI) youth experience high rates of mental health comorbidities. While gender-affirming medical care (GAMC) provides psychological benefit, GI youth often present to care at older ages. The goals of this study were to 1) assess the relationship between age at presentation to GAMC and rates of mental health comorbidities, 2) identify factors influencing when youth present to GAMC, and 3) determine whether older presenting youth face more barriers to care. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional chart review of patients presenting to GAMC. Subjects were classified a priori as younger presenting youth (YPY): &amp;lt;15 years of age at presentation or older presenting youth (OPY): &amp;gt; 15 years of age. Self-reported rates of mental health comorbidities and medication use were compared between groups. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify determinants of mental health comorbidities. Covariates included pubertal stage at presentation, social transition status, and assigned sex. Next, we performed a sequential exploratory mixed-methods study. Factors influencing age at presentation to GAMC were explored through 24 semi-structured interviews with OPY, YPY, and their caregivers (OPY-C and YPY-C). Thematic analysis identified themes with differential representation between OPY/OPY-C and YPY/YPY-C. From these themes, a questionnaire was designed and distributed to youth and caregivers presenting for follow-up. Responses were compared between OPY and YPY and between OPY-C and YPY-C. Results: Of 300 youth, there were184 OPY and 116 YPY. Upon presentation, more OPY than YPY reported a diagnosis of depression (46% vs. 30%), had self-harmed (40% vs. 28%), had considered suicide (52% vs. 40%), had attempted suicide (17% vs. 9%), and required psychoactive medications (36% vs. 23%), all p &amp;lt; .05. After controlling for covariates, late puberty (Tanner stage 4 or 5) was associated with depressive disorders (OR 5.49 [95% CI: 1.14, 26.32]) and anxiety disorders (OR 4.18 [95% CI: 1.22, 14.49]) while older age remained associated only with psychoactive medication use (OR 1.31 [95% CI: 1.05, 1.63]). Six themes were identified from interviews that influenced age at first clinic visit, including individual, environmental, and healthcare system factors. 101/152 youth and 102/147 caregivers completed questionnaires. While OPY/OPY-C did not endorse more barriers to care than YPY/YPY-C, more OPY than YPY had religious families (54% vs 28%, p=.01) while more YPY than OPY had LGBTQ+ family members (46% vs. 20%, p=.006). Conclusions: Older age and late pubertal stage are associated with worse mental health among GI youth presenting to GAMC. Our findings emphasize the importance of timely access to GAMC for GI youth and highlight familial environment as a factor that influences when youth present to gender-affirmative care.

OR15-02 Mental Health Implications and Determinants of When Youth Present to a Gender Clinic