English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

It is estimated that the prevalence of adrenal incidentaloma increases with age: ~3% of those aged 50 years, rising to 10% in those &amp;gt;70 years (1). Given the aging population together with increased utilisation of cross-sectional imaging in the UK (eg CT urogram, MR angiogram), we explored the proportion of patients with adrenal incidentaloma by age based on current imaging trends. Furthermore, there is no information currently available on the relationship between age and pattern of endocrine referrals. We extracted data for all CT and MRI scans from Jan 2018-Oct 2019 and used key phrases in radiology reports (eg adrenal adenoma/lesion/mass/nodule/incidentaloma, incidental adrenal, indeterminate adrenal) to identify potential lesions. We also extracted data on patient age and referral patterns as identified by a logged referral or an attendance (new or follow-up) to endocrine clinic 3 months post index scan, stratified by 10 year age groups. Where possible, we excluded false hits (eg no adrenal lesion). Preliminary data showed that, of the 2604 potential lesions identified by CT and MRI scans, 78.7% were on patients aged over 60 years. The numbers of identified lesions gradually increased with age to a peak in the 71-80 year age group after which these declined. Whilst patients younger that 60 years had fewer potential lesions identified, they were more likely to be referred to endocrine services (73 out of 55 patients; 13.2%) than those in the older age group (168 out of 2049; 8.2%; p&amp;lt;0.001). Indeed there was a statistically significant trend towards decreasing referral with age group (Chi-squared test for trend; p&amp;lt;0.001). In conclusion, patients over 60 years have a higher number of potential adrenal incidentalomas. However, this group is less likely to be referred for endocrine evaluation. This is particularly concerning given the large number of scans requested and the higher prevalence of incidentalomas in this age group. This study represents preparatory work on innovations to enhance case detection, particularly in the older age groups (2). 1. Fassnacht M, Arlt W, Bancos I, et al. Management of adrenal incidentalomas: European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016;175:G1-G34 2. Hanna FWF, Issa BG, Lea SC, George C, Golash A, Firn M, Ogunmekan S, Maddock E, Sim J, Xydopoulos G, Fordham R, Fryer AA. Adrenal lesions found incidentally: how to improve clinical and cost-effectiveness. BMJ Open Quality. 2019;In press.

SAT-168 Adrenal Incidentalomas: Impact of Patient Age on Referral Rates for Endocrine Evaluation