English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

To evaluate the adaptation of electrodermal techniques for cystic fibrosis screening, skin surface bioelectric measurements were recorded from 37 established cystic fibrosis patients, 45 asthmatic patients, and 10 normal controls, ranging in age from 6 to 22 yr. Six skin potential and six skin conductance measures of sweat gland activity without the collection of sweat distinguished between the cystic fibrosis, normal, and asthmatic groups (F ratios greater than 10.0; p less than 0.0001). Discriminant analysis using the two best electrodermal measures (the mean of five preresponse potential levels and the mean of five preresponse conductance levels for each subject) to assign experimental group membership matched actual group membership with 92.7% accuracy. We believe these results warrant further investigation of electrodermal procedures as a direct, simple, yet noninvasive means of screening for cystic fibrosis.

Electrodermal Potential and Conductance Measurements Clinically Discriminate between Cystic Fibrosis and Control Patients