English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Aims and Method  Advocacy is assuming an increasingly important role in the delivery of mental health services, but many psychiatrists feel threatened by it. This study was performed to ascertain how much doctors and nurses know about advocacy and their attitudes towards it. We interviewed five senior house officers, five staff nurses and four community psychiatric nurses (CPNs) to examine their understanding, experience and opinions about advocacy. A full-time advocate was also interviewed to establish his views about how well staff understood his role.    Results  In general there was poor understanding of the background and training of advocates, and their Code of Practice. There were also important differences in the way in which different groups of staff saw advocacy, with CPNs having the best understanding. Experiences of advocacy were positive and it was seen as being helpful both for clients and staff, despite fears that advocates might work to their ‘own agendas'.    Clinical Implications  There is a need to improve psychiatrists' understanding of what advocacy is, through the involvement of advocates and service users in their training. This would help to allay their anxieties about the role of advocates.

A survey of psychiatrists' and nurses' views of mental health advocacy