English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Aims and method  This paper describes the characteristics and outcome of the first 20 patients seen by a newly appointed specialist registrar in cognitive therapy. The outcome of the first (cases 1–10) and second (cases 11–20) cohorts were evaluated to assess if training had any impact on clinical effectiveness.    Results  Comorbidity was common, but more patients improved following the intervention (effect size=0.64–1.34). The 25% therapy drop-out rate was comparable with previously reported rates. Four out of five patients who dropped out had Cluster B personality disorders. The two cohorts showed similar baseline characteristics, but the second cohort showed improved outcome (effect size of training=0.89–1.04) and had a significantly shorter course of therapy ( P =0.02).    Clinical Implications  Specialist registrar training in cognitive therapy provides experience in treating a wide variety of mental disorders. The routine collection and analysis of clinical and psychometric data helps identify training effectiveness and training needs. The data demonstrate that training was associated with improved patient outcomes.

Is specialist registrar training in cognitive therapy effective?