English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background The ankle-brachial index measurement is used for screening and diagnosis of lower-extremity peripheral artery disease and cardiovascular risk assessment. However, the value is occasionally unreliable since the oscillometric ankle-brachial index can be elevated and falsely normalized despite the presence of lower-extremity peripheral artery disease because of the incompressibility of infrapopliteal arteries at the ankle, potentially leading to a missed diagnosis of lower-extremity peripheral artery disease or underestimation of cardiovascular risk. Case presentation We report two cases of lower extremity peripheral artery disease with normal ankle-brachial index (a 76-year-old Asian man and a 66-year-old Asian man). In both cases, the ankle-brachial index was within the normal range (1.00–1.40) despite the presence of lower-extremity peripheral artery disease, whereas upstroke time at the ankle calculated from the pulse volume waveform simultaneously obtained by plethysmography during the ankle-brachial index measurement was prolonged (≥ 180 milliseconds). Diagnostic imaging tests revealed the presence of occlusive arterial disease in the lower extremity and severe calcification of infrapopliteal arteries. Conclusions In both cases, the oscillometric ankle-brachial index might have been falsely normalized despite the presence of lower-extremity peripheral artery disease because of calcified incompressible infrapopliteal arteries. Sole reliance on the ankle-brachial index value may lead to a missed diagnosis of lower-extremity peripheral artery disease or underestimation of cardiovascular risk. Upstroke time at the ankle was helpful for suspecting the presence of lower-extremity peripheral artery disease in both patients with normal ankle-brachial index. In addition to history-taking and vascular examination, upstroke time at the ankle should be carefully checked for accurate diagnosis of peripheral artery disease and cardiovascular risk assessment in patients with normal ankle-brachial index.

Falsely normalized ankle-brachial index despite the presence of lower-extremity peripheral artery disease: two case reports