English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The original publication [1] is missing one reference in the reference list. This reference should be also cited within the text. This error was caused during typesetting. The publisher apologizes to the readers for the inconvenience caused. The correct reference and citation can be found here:\ud\ud13. Martin Bland J, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet. 1986. 327(8476):307-10. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8.\ud\udThe Bland-Altman [13] analysis of agreement method was used to compare local and central measurements

trials

Erratum to: Measurement of HbA1c in multicentre diabetes trials – should blood samples be tested locally or sent to a central laboratory: an agreement analysis