English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In this version of this article that was originally published [1] the authors had analysed two HeLa samples, SRR1637089 and SRR1637090, in Fig. 3 of the original publication. The authors had respectively analysed the samples as RNaseR+ and Ribominus, due to their incorrect annotations in a public database, but they were both Ribominus samples. The authors have now analysed appropriate positive and negative controls using their method, KNIFE, and find_circ. The results are presented in an amended version of Fig. 3c, please see updated version below. Furthermore, the authors have now provided a list of accession codes for the ENCODE data they analysed, please see the Table 1 below. Please note this was not part of the original article. Source (cell line name or tissue type), Type of sample (tissue, polyA+ cell line, or polyA- cell line), and Accession code for all ENCODE data analyzed.]

genome biology

Erratum to: Statistically based splicing detection reveals neural enrichment and tissue-specific induction of circular RNA during human fetal development