English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Dear Editor, We read with great interest the editorial by Gattinoni et al. describing two time-dependent chronological phenotypes of patients suffering from Covid-19 pneumonia [1]. We do not only agree about the role of vasoplegia accounting for hypoxemia but we also believe that this lung vascular disorder is the common denominator of Covid-19 pneumonia which is present at all stages of the disease, making useless to distinguish type 1 and type 2 Covid-19 ARDS. In spontaneously breathing patients hospitalized for Covid-19 pneumonia, we have observed a severe hypoxemia despite Chest CT scans showing quite limited grass-ground like opacities. Because of the limited alveolar damage, such hypoxemia can be best explained by a low ventilation-to-perfusion (VA/Q) ratio where VA is preserved and Q is increased which we suggest to be related to an increase in pulmonary vascular flow and not to an inhibited hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (supposing that Alveolar PO2 is preserved). Moreover, assuming that alveolar ventilation is conserved, compensatory hyperventilation rapidly leads to hypocapnia which is known to be a very powerful inhibitor of the hypoxic ventilatory response [2]. This may explain the surprising lack of dyspnea noted in these patients. Some of these patients may worsen (extension of grassground like opacities, appearance of lung consolidations) requiring ICU transfer. These patients effectively present a non-typical ARDS with refractory hypoxemia, a slightly decreased lung compliance, and low lung recruitability (type 1 described by Gattinoni) and, in our experience, rarely show right ventricular dysfunction as in typical ARDS (personal data). In a recent post-mortem study on Covid-19 patients, Varga et al. found endothelial cell infection by SRAS-Cov2 and endotheliitis [3]. This might be explained by the presence of ACE-2 receptors on vascular endothelial cells [4]. All these findings suggest a specific pulmonary vascular disorder induced by SARS-CoV-2, leading us to consider it as an acute vascular distress syndrome (AVDS) more than an atypical ARDS. Nevertheless, some patients do evolve to a more typical ARDS (type 2 described by Gattinoni et al.) due to extensive lung consolidations. Finally, when such patients recover from Covid-19 pneumonia, we observe a return to normoxia despite the persistence and, sometimes the worsening, of lung consolidations compared to the early stage of ARDS. To conclude, according to our findings and to recent publications, we hypothesize that Covid-19 patients, at any stages of their disease, are characterized by an increased pulmonary blood flow with intrapulmonary right to left shunt with limited alveolar injury.

Severe Covid-19 disease: rather AVDS than ARDS?