English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background  Vitamin K is a key point for guarantee normal blood clotting and its level in newborns is commonly low, so a supplementation after delivery is mandatory.  Vitamin K prophylaxis in newborns is still an open field of debate: many types of protocol have been proposed in different years and Countries, and sometimes with great variability inside the same Nation (for instance, in Italy a national consensus is not available, so different protocols are employed). Recommendations include different protocols for healthy newborns born at term, but the unpreventable presence of bleeding favouring factors (i.e. blood vessels malformations) or limiting intestinal absorption of liposoluble vitamins (i.e. cholestasis), which could be unrecognized or subclinical in the perinatal period, rises some concerning about the most precautionary route of administration and the timing of further doses after the first one given at birth.  The purpose of this report is to underline the most recent evidences available in literature and to arise a debate about this topic, in order to stimulate the production of evidence-based guidelines concerning the prophylaxis with vitamin K1 in newborn infants, considering that many bleeding risk factors are not recognizable at birth.    Case presentation  We are hereby presenting an emblematic case concerning the risk of intracranial bleeding in an apparently healthy newborn: the described infant did not show any pathological elements in pregnancy history or perinatal life which suggest a possible increased risk of bleeding and the needing of a particular approach in the administration of vitamin K1, but at the end of the first week of life presented an intracranial bleeding with neurological symptoms that required treatment for vitamin K deficiency.    Conclusions  Univocal recommendations about vitamin K prophylaxis are not available and the contrast between oral and intramuscular routes persists unsolved. The difficulty to certainly identify an infant eligible for oral administration of vitamin K1 at birth suggests that the intramuscular route should be preferred. How to prosecute the supplementation in the first months of life is still an open topic of debate.

Vitamin K deficiency bleeding in an apparently healthy newborn infant: the compelling need for evidence-based recommendation