English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The authors found errors in Table 1 after publication of the original article [1]. The correct values for medical history of coronary artery disease (CAD) at baseline are 110 (40%) of all patients, 54 (35.5%) of patients categorized as having normoglycaemia, 42 (46.7%) of patients categorized as having intermediate hyperglycaemia, and 14 (42.4%) of patients categorized as having DM. All presented numbers and calculations in Table 1 are checked. No other errors were found. The presented errors did not affect results, scientific content or conclusions. The corrected Table 1 is presented in this erratum. The authors apologize for having presented this error in the original article.

Correction to: HbA1c versus oral glucose tolerance test as a method to diagnose diabetes mellitus in vascular surgery patients