English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Erratum Following publication of the original article in BMC Medical Ethics [1], it was brought to my attention that the following sentences are incorrect: “Moreover, genetics professionals appear to think that to know is better than not to know [25] even when the information is actionable [26].” This sentence should read: Moreover, genetics professionals appear to think that to know is better than not to know [25] even when the information is not actionable [26]. “Let me therefore now turn to arguments for a right to know before summarizing the arguments in Table 1.” This sentence should read: Let me therefore now turn to arguments for a right not to know before summarizing the arguments in Table 1. I apologise for the inconvenience this may have caused.

Erratum to: Incidental findings of uncertain significance: To know or not to know – that is not the question