English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background  Non-contrast FLAIR revealed increased signal within the inner ear in patients with vestibular schwannoma, which is generally assumed to occur in the perilymph; however, the majority of previous studies did not differentiate between the endolymph and perilymph. Therefore, endolymph signal changes have not yet been investigated in detail. The purpose of the present study was three-fold: (1) to assess perilymph signal changes in patients with vestibular schwannoma on heavily T2-weighted (T2W) 3D FLAIR, also termed positive perilymphatic images (PPI), (2) to evaluate signal and morphological changes in the endolymph on PPI, and (3) to establish whether vertigo correlates with the signal intensity ratios (SIR) of the vestibular perilymph or vestibular endolymphatic hydrops.    Methods  Forty-two patients with unilateral vestibular schwannoma were retrospectively recruited. We semi-quantitatively and qualitatively evaluated the perilymph signal intensity on the affected and unaffected sides. We also quantitatively examined the signal intensity of the vestibular perilymph and assessed the relationship between vertigo and the SIR of the vestibular perilymph on the affected side. We semi-quantitatively or qualitatively evaluated the endolymph, and investigated whether vestibular hydrops correlated with vertigo.    Results  The perilymph on the affected side showed abnormal signal more frequently (signal intensity grade: overall mean 1.45 vs. 0.02; comparison of signal intensity: overall mean 36 vs. 0 cases) and in more parts (the entire inner ear vs. the basal turn of the cochlea and vestibule) than that on the unaffected side. No significant difference was observed in the SIR of the vestibular perilymph with and without vertigo (5.54 vs. 5.51,  p  = 0.18). The endolymph of the vestibule and semicircular canals showed the following characteristic features: no visualization (n = 4), signal change (n = 1), or vestibular hydrops (n = 10). A correlation was not observed between vestibular hydrops and vertigo ( p  = 1.000).    Conclusions  PPI may provide useful information on signal and morphological changes in the endolymph of patients with vestibular schwannoma. Further research is warranted to clarify the relationship between vertigo and the MR features of the inner ear.

Signal and morphological changes in the endolymph of patients with vestibular schwannoma on non-contrast 3D FLAIR at 3 Tesla