English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background  This study aimed to evaluate the oral switch (OS) stewardship intervention in the intensive care unit (ICU).    Methods  This was a retrospective study with a convenience sample in two Brazilian ICUs from different hospitals in patients with sepsis receiving antibiotic therapy. The stewardship intervention included OS in patients diagnosed with sepsis when clinical stability was achieved. The primary outcome was overall mortality. Other variables evaluated were as follows: cost of antimicrobial treatment, daily costs of intensive care, acute kidney injury, and length of stay.    Results  There was no difference in mortality between the OS and non-OS groups ( p  = 0.06). Length of stay in the ICU ( p  = 0.029) was shorter and acute kidney injury incidence ( p  = 0.032) and costs of antimicrobial therapy ( p  < 0.001) were lower in the OS group.    Conclusion  OS stewardship programs in the ICU may be considered a safe strategy. Switch therapy reduced the cost and shortened the length of stay in ICUs.    Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-019-4280-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Intravenous-to-oral antibiotic switch therapy: a cross-sectional study in critical care units