English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background  A simple method to estimate CD4 counts in stable, HIV infected virologically-suppressed and immune-reconstituted adults could save the expense of unnecessary formal testing.    Methods  Using a baseline CD4 percent, CD4 counts were estimated from subsequent absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC) measured by an automated FBC machine (CD4 estimate calculated by the ALC multiplied by the baseline CD4 percent). The accuracy of this approach was established in a large, retrospective clinical laboratory dataset of virologically-suppressed HIV infected subjects. A case–control study explored important clinical factors for accurate estimates, and a heuristic algorithm was derived and validated in a random sample.    Results  Data from 3,630 subjects were available. CD4 counts were generally accurately estimated, with a mean 6.1 % underestimation. Overall 83.3 % of CD4 estimates were within 25 % of the actual values, with 12.1 % CD4 counts underestimated by more than 25 %, and 4.5 % overestimated. The CD4 count was increasingly underestimated with time from baseline, and the degree of underestimation correlated with baseline CD4 percent (p < 0.0001). From the case–control study, baseline CD4 percent of ≥20, no illness requiring hospitalization and more than a year since starting or switch of anti-retroviral therapy were identified as significant predictors of inaccurate estimates. Employing this simple algorithm, CD4 estimate accuracy improved to a mean 1.3 % underestimation, and the proportion of estimates within 25 % of the actual value increased to 93.4 %.    Conclusions  In virologically-suppressed and immune-reconstituted HIV-infected adults, the CD4 count can be accurately estimated from the ALC using a baseline CD4 percent for at least 2 years after measurement.

bmc infectious diseases

Derivation and validation of an accurate estimation of CD4 counts from the absolute lymphocyte count in virologically suppressed and immunologically reconstituted HIV infected adults