English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background Chronic diseases are often associated with sexual dysfunction (SD). Little is known about the practice patterns of general practitioners (GPs) regarding sexual care for chronically ill patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine; to what extent GPs discuss SD with chronically ill patients; the barriers that may stop them; and the factors associated with discussing SD. Methods A cross-sectional survey using a 58-item questionnaire was sent to 604 Dutch GPs. Descriptive statistics and associations were used for analysis of the data. Results Nearly 58% ( n  = 350) of all GPs approached gave a response and 204 questionnaires were analysable (33.8%). Almost 60% of respondents considered discussing SD with patients important (58.3%,  n  = 119). During the first consultation, 67.5% ( n  = 137) of the GPs reported that they never discussed SD. The most important barrier stopping them was lack of time (51.7%,  n  = 104). The majority (90.2%,  n  = 184) stated that the GP was responsible for addressing SD; 70.1% ( n  = 143) indicated that the GP practice somatic care nurse (GPN) was also responsible. Nearly 80% ( n  = 161) of respondents were unaware of agreements within the practice on accountability for discussing SD. This group discussed SD less often during first and follow-up consults ( p  = 0.002 and  p  &lt; 0.001, respectively). Of the respondents, 61.5% ( n  = 116) felt that they had received insufficient education in SD and 74.6% ( n  = 150) stated that the subject is seldom discussed during training. Approximately 62% of the GPs ( n  = 123) wanted to increase their knowledge, preferably through extra training. According to 53.2% of the GPs ( n  = 107) it was important to improve the knowledge of the GPN. The most frequently mentioned tool that could help improve the conversation about SD was the availability of information brochures for patients ( n  = 123, 60.3%). Conclusions This study indicates that Dutch GPs do not discuss SD with chronically ill patients routinely, mainly due to lack of time. An efficient tool is needed to enable GPs to address SD in a time-saving manner. Increased availability of informational materials, agreements on accountability within GP practices, and extra training for the GPs and GPNs could improve the discussion of SD.

Let’s talk about sex: exploring factors influencing the discussion of sexual health among chronically Ill patients in general practice