English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background This study aimed to review the impact of quality control management on the treatment of severely injured patients. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with severe injury (injury severity score [ISS] ≥ 16) between January 1, 2018 and February 1, 2020. The selected patients were stratified as follows. The patients who were admitted prior to the implementation of quality control management—from January 1 to December 31, 2018—were assigned to the PRE group; the POST group included patients who were admitted after the implementation—from February 1, 2019 to February 1, 2020. Quality control management was implemented from January 1, 2019 to January 31, 2019. Parameters were compared to account for differences in terms of demographics, surgical procedures, results of process quality, and 72-h mortality. Results This study included 599 patients (PRE group: 212 males and 86 females; POST group: 228 males and 73 females;  P  = 0.20). The extent of document completion was 97.3 and 100% in the PRE and POST groups, respectively ( P  &lt; 0.001). There was no delay in the arrival of the trauma surgeons or the multidisciplinary team after implementation. However, following implementation of quality control management, there was a significant reduction in the duration of basic diagnostics, time until receipt of laboratory data, time until first computed tomography scan, time until intubation, and time until an emergency operation ( P  &lt; 0.05). The deaths were caused by severe head injury (PRE: 5.4%, POST: 4%), hemorrhagic shock (PRE: 2.4%, POST: 0.7%), multiple-organ failure (PRE: 1.0%, POST: 0.3%), or other causes (PRE: 0.7%, POST: 0.0%). The 72-h mortality decreased after the implementation of quality control management (PRE vs. POST groups: 9.4 vs. 5.0%,  P  = 0.04). Conclusions The implementation of quality control management resulted in decreased time to critical interventions, improved patient care efficiency, and reduced early mortality. We recommend that this approach be replicated at other trauma centers in China.

bmc emergency medicine

Effect of implementing quality control management in the treatment of severely injured patients: a retrospective cohort study in a level I trauma center in China