English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Inside the luminal breast cancer (BC) group, the B subclass carries a worse prognosis and is less responsive to hormonal treatment. Identification of the luminal B group, by Sorlie and colleagues [1], has been less consistent than other subclasses; and gene signatures based in estrogen-related genes or proliferation are better to identify this BC subclass. Cheang and colleagues genetically evaluated 144 luminal ER-positive HER2-negative tumors by IHC; they found a ki67 cutoff value of 13.25% to differentiate B from A subclasses [2]. No differentiation for PR status was done. The luminal B subgroup is usually defined as ki67 >13 if ER-positive, as well as HER2-positive or PR-negative. The target of this abstract is to evaluate behavior of different luminal B subsets.

Getting deep in the luminal B breast cancer subtype and its ki67 cut-off value