English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Background When the new bilateral air space pacification develops, we are usually indistinguishable bilateral pulmonary infiltrates from congestive cardiac failure. Until now, for the differential diagnosis of cardiogenic edema and pneumonia, laboratory finding including white blood cell (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and imaging studies such as chest computed tomography (CT) and/or echocardiography were have been used. We evaluated whether chest ultrasound (CUS, heart+lung) could assist in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary edema and pneumonia. So, we conducted a comparison between clinical diagnosis (C-Dx) with the result of the laboratory finding and sonographic diagnosis (US-Dx) with CUS.

intensive care medicine experimental

Chest ultrasound for evaluation of bilateral pulmonary infiltrates in initensive care unit: A comparison with clinical assessment, sonographic assessment