English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Results The overall infection, resp. infected patients prevalence was 18.9% and 16.5%. The three most frequent infections were 1) skin or soft tissue (38.7%), 2) lower (22.5%) and 3) upper respiratory tract infections (11.4%). The prevalence of antibiotics’ use was 2,7%. The implementation of a hand hygiene campaign resulted in significant decreased prevalence of infected patients: 17.7% (95% CI: 17.1-18.3) before versus 15.1% (95% CI: 14.415.7) in the 4-years after the implementation. Antibiotics’ use among infected patients diminished from 17.5% to 14.0% (p<0.001). Conclusion These results are suggestive for a statistically and clinically significant effect of hand hygiene campaigns. Per 1000 patients/year, 37 infections and 26 infected patients have potentially been avoided.

antimicrobial resistance and infection control

P236: Effect of a prevention campaign on the prevalence of infections among patients in Belgian psychiatric hospitals: a dynamic prospective cohort study (2001-2010)