English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Methods We included all adult patients (≥15 years) with a firsttime admission of community-acquired sepsis of any severity at a medical Emergency Department (ED) between September 2010 and August 2011 and who survived to discharge. Cases were identified by manual chart review using predefined criteria of infection. Data on vital signs, laboratory values, and antibiotic treatment were obtained electronically. We computed the median time to readmission and combined the severe sepsis and septic shock category due to the low number of patients with septic shock (N = 14). We used the Wilcoxon RankSum test to test whether there was any difference in the median time to readmission among patients discharged after an admission with sepsis compared to severe sepsis/ septic shock. Patients were followed until death, emigration, readmission to the hospital, or 90 days after discharge with sepsis of any severity, whichever came first.

Risk of readmission following admission with community-acquired sepsis to a medical emergency department - a follow up study