English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Results 1) The average initial angle is: 28,19 (+-9,21) for thoracic, 28,11 (+-9,34) for thoraco-lumbar and 25,86 (+-7,04) for lumbar curves. 2) The angular reducibility is 54 % in braces for the thoracic curvatures, 69 % for the thoraco-lumbar curvatures and of 73 % for the lumbar curvatures, which corresponds to the usual results of the Lyon management. If we select curves of 30° and more the reducibility is respectively: 48,5 % for thoracic, 67 % for thoraco-lumbar and lumbar curves. 3) The reducibility in brace is better for the group of the electronic moulding than for the group in plaster cast. For all cases, the improvement of reducibility is 3,63° for thoracic, 3,02 for thoraco-lumbar and 2,14° for lumbar curves. This improvement is better if we select the initial curves of 30° and more: respectively 5,44° for thoracic, 4,75° for thoraco-lumbar and 3,89° for lumbar curves. This difference is however not statistically significant. Conclusions Such results are in favour of the electronic moulding, which remains however delicate and require a precise position of the patient during the surface topography and well trained orthotic technicians.

A statistic approach to electronic moulding versus traditional plaster moulding