English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Background Adjustable (often-called programmable) CSF valves have been developed by several manufacturers. These valves are more expensive, but have an advantage in that the operating pressure of the valve can be altered by the use of an external magnet as a simple procedure. The proportion of these valves used in the UK and Ireland has increased from 4.9% in 2000 to 22.4% in 2006. We have used data collected by the UK Shunt Registry to assess the effectiveness of these valves in reducing valve replacement for under and over-drainage using a case-control design. Materials and methods The UK Shunt Registry contains data on nearly 30,000 CSF shunt-related procedures. Our data suggests that primary factors involved in shunt revision are patient age, diagnosis and the number of revisions a patient has had. Procedures were identified where either a Medtronic Strata Valve or Codman Hakim Programmable Valve was used. Of these 1,389 had an accurate diagnosis and age entered and we were able to determine the exact number of shunt revisions. A database search was performed for procedures matched for patient age, diagnosis and revision status but using Medtronic or Codman fixed-pressure valves. Matches were found for 943 procedures.

Are adjustable valves effective? Data from the UK Shunt Registry