English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background Our experience with evaluation of spina bifida with urinary incontinence has evolved through three phases. In the first phase, before the year 2000 we were doing only machine urodynamics. In the second phase with machine urodynamics from (2000 to 2003), we took study to compare the observations and results of simple clinical bedside evaluation (SCBE) in taking management decisions in patients with spina bifida and urinary incontinence. In the third phase, from 2004 onwards, we have stopped doing machine urodynamics completely in evaluation of patients and now do only SCBE. We believe that SCBE is sufficient to take management decisions in such patients. In this paper we will present data of 10 patients of spina bifida whose management decisions were made using SCBE.

cerebrospinal fluid research

Simple clinical and bedside urodynamic evaluation is sufficient for successful management decisions in spina bifida patients with urinary incontinence and the machine urodynamics are not necessary