English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Methods Ten female subjects (20.4 ± 0.70 y; 166.9 ± 7.2 cm; 67.0 ± 7.0 kg; 29.6 ± 6.5% body fat) underwent two testing sessions administered in a randomized and double-blind fashion. During each session, subjects reported to the Human Performance Laboratory after at least 3-h postabsorptive state and were provided either 140 ml of the high-energy supplement (S; commercially marketed as Meltdown RTD®) or placebo (P). Subjects consumed two 70 ml doses of S or P, separated by 30 min. Subjects then rested in a semi-recumbent position for three hours. VO2 and HR were determined every 5 min during the first 30 min and every 10 min during the next 150 min. BP was determined every 15 min during the first 30 min and every 30 min thereafter. The profile of mood states and questionnaire focusing on alertness, focus and fatigue was determined every 30 minutes. Area under the curve (AUC) analysis was computed for VO2, whereas a 3 hour average and an average for each hour was calculated for RQ, kcal from carbohydrate, kcal from fat, total kcal, HR, BP, and mood states. Results AUC analysis revealed a significant 10.8% difference in VO2 between S and P for the 3 hour study period. No significant differences in oxygen consumption were seen in the first hour following ingestion of the supplement. Oxygen consumption was significantly elevated within the second hour (13.9%) and third hour (11.9%) following ingestion. A significant difference in energy expenditure was also seen between S (1.09 ± 0.10 kcal·min-1) and P (0.99 ± 0.09 kcal·min-1) for the 3 hour study period. Although energy expenditure was not significantly differently different between S and P in the first hour, significant differences between the groups were seen in the second (1.10 ± 0.11 kcal·min-1 and0.99 ± 0.09 kcal·min-1, respectively), and third hour (1.08 ± 0.11 kcal·min-1 and 0.99 ± 0.09 kcal·min-1, respectively). Significantly higher systolic BP (p < 0.01) was observed between S (110.0 ± 3.9 mmHg) and P (107.3 ± 4.4 mmHg) during the three hour study period. No significant differences were seen in HR or diastolic BP at any time point. No significant differences were seen between S and P in any of the mood states measured during the study.

Thermogenic effect of Meltdown RTD™ energy supplement in young healthy college women