English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background In juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), substantial disagreement between physicians, parents and children over disease remission can lead to difficulty in assessing the efficacy of treatments. It is, therefore, important to ascertain whether clinicians’, parents’ and children’s opinions converge and diverge and whether the recently developed criteria for inactive disease (ID) or minimal disease activity (MDA) may help enhance concordance. Objective

Agreement between objective and subjective definitions of inactive disease, remission and minimal disease activity in juvenile idiopathic arthritis