English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Results Stroke volume from 4D flow was lower compared to 2D flow (5ch Resp(+) 86.9±17.0 vs 97.1±22.7, p=0.001; 5ch Resp(-) 83.9±16.0 vs 97.1±22.7, pu003c0.001), with no difference in bias (-10.3±11.0% vs -13.8±11.9%, p=0.16) (Figure 1). There was a good correlation between Resp(+) and Resp(-) for particle-trace derived volumes (R=0.82, 1.6±12.4%), mean kinetic energy (R=0.86, -4.3±12.4%), peak kinetic energy (R=0.88, 0.7±16.9%), and vortexring volume (R=0.70, -3.7±13.2%). Average scan duration for Resp(-) was shorter compared to Resp(+) (27±9 min vs 61±19 min, pu003c0.05). Conclusions Whole-heart 4D flow can be acquired with preserved quality without respiratory gating, facilitating clinical use.

Whole-heart 4D flow can be acquired with preserved quality without respiratory gating facilitating clinical use