English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Methods Five patients with CHD were included in this pilot study (table 2 in Figure 2). The FB MR studies were performed on a Philips Acheiva 1.5T magnet using a 5-channel phased array coil (see Table 1 in Figure 1) 1. Respiratory synchronized [1], time-resolved MRA 2. Equilibrium phase MRA 3. 3D cine SSFP 4.4D phase contrast (PC) flow imaging 5.3D whole-heart single phase SSFP (coronary) Comparative data was obtained using conventional 2D cine RT SSFP sequences [2] in the VLA, 4 chamber and short axis planes, and 2D PC imaging. Data Analysis: Image quality assessment and quantitative volumetric and flow analysis were performed by three blinded, experienced users. MRA images were graded using a semi-quantitative scale from 1-5 for relevant imaging targets in CHD [1], with 1: excellent, no limitations, and 5: non-diagnostic. The clinical scoring system for 2D and 3D cine SSFP was based on bloodmyocardial contrast, endocardial edge definition and inter-slice alignment [2]. Paired t-test analysis was performed on LV and RV volumes obtained by an experienced observer using the same software

Unsupervised free-breathing 3-dimensional imaging of morphology, function and flow in congenital heart disease under 30 minutes: pilot study