English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background Cardiac T1 and extracellular volume fraction (ECV), derived from preand post-contrast cardiac and blood T1 measurements, are emerging imaging biomarkers of diffuse cardiac fibrosis. The most frequently used cardiac T1 mapping pulse sequence is MOLLI [1]. However, MOLLI is known to be sensitive to rapid heart rate and irregular rhythm, because it is based on inversion-recovery (IR) of magnetization preparation. In response, we developed an arrhythmia-insensitive-rapid (AIR) cardiac T1 mapping pulse sequence based on B1insensitive saturation-recovery (SR) of magnetization preparation [2]. Our prior study [2] showed that AIR (scan time = 2-3 heart beats) is faster and yields more accurate cardiac T1 measurements than MOLLI (scan time = 17 heart beats). We sought to compare ECV measurements between SR-based AIR and IR-based MOLLI cardiac T1 mapping at 3T.

Comparison of ECV measurements during equilibrium between IR- and SR-based Cardiac T1Mapping