English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Methods Five patients with CHD were included in this pilot study. The MR studies were performed on a Philips Acheiva 1.5T magnet using a multielement phased array coil with the following sequences in this order: 1. Free-breathing, respiratory synchronized [1], time-resolved MRA following injection of 0.03 mmol/kg of Gadofosveset, and injection rate 2-4cc/second using a power injector. Duration: < 1 minute 2. Free breathing equilibrium phase MRA, acquired voxel size 0.8 × 0.8 × 1.6 mm, 2 NEX. Duration: 2.5-4 minutes 3. Free breathing 3D cine SSFP with respiratory triggering (TR/TE/flip angle: 3/1.5/60; acquired voxel size: 1.5-1.9 × 1.5-2.1 × 7-8 mm3; SENSE acceleration factor: 1.5-2 × 1.5-2; temporal resolution: 30-45 ms). Duration: 4.5-7 minutes 4. Free breathing sagittal 4D phase contrast (PC) imaging with respiratory navigator (18-26 phases/cardiac cycle, Venc 150 cm/sec, spatial resolution 1.6-2.8 mm3.) Duration: 6-12 minutes 5. Free breathing 3D SSFP with respiratory navigator. (acquired voxel size 1 × 1 × 2 mm3) Duration: 5-7 minutes Comparative data was obtained using conventional 2D cine respiratory triggered SSFP sequences (2) in the VLA, 4 chamber and short axis planes, and 2D PC imaging. Data Analysis: Image quality assessment and quantitative volumetric and flow analysis was performed by a single blinded user. MRA images were graded using a semi-quantitative scale from 1-5 for relevant imaging targets in CHD [1], with 1: excellent, no limitations, and 5: non-diagnostic. The clinical scoring system for 2D and 3D cine SSFP was based on blood-myocardial contrast, endocardial edge definition and inter-slice alignment[2]. Paired t-test analysis was performed on LV and RV volumes.

Unsupervised free-breathing 3D imaging of morphology, function and flow in congenital heart disease